Linda Best Photo ©
The Board
of Regents
Evolves
by Brenda McDonald,
MSU Communications Services
Never far from the spotlight, the Montana Board of Regents is often maligned and more often misunderstood by the public as it pilots the course of higher education in the state.
But current Board Chairman Richard Roehm, '57 Micro, of Bozeman, hopes a new openness by the board with community forums throughout the state will go a long way toward broadening the public's understanding of the board's work.
"We want the people to know we work for them," he said. "We want to know what they don't understand about the operation of higher education and how they think we're doing, good or bad."
The seven-member all-volunteer board was given broad powers by constitutional mandate in 1971. According to "In the People's Interest," the centennial history of MSU, Montana's constitutional convention reorganized higher education and separated it from K-12 education. The delegates believed that higher education had become too complex for one board to administer and comprehend.
As a result, the Board of Regents would have full power, responsibility and authority to supervise, coordinate, manage and control the university system. To this end the delegates created a Commissioner of Higher Education with duties and responsibilities established by the regents.
The move was made to counter what had been the tendency for legislators to intervene in the day-to-day life of the university system. The new mandate limited the legislature's ability to determine how and where monies appropriated for education were to be spent.
The legislature would continue to hold the purse strings, but the specific allocation of those monies within the university system would be the responsibility of the commissioner and the board.
It's that arms-length relationship and a perceived lack of accountability that has set the stage for contention over the years. But Roehm and the current board are working to ease that contentiousness with information and collaboration with the legislature and the executive branch.
"We want to partner with state government and be viewed as a positive, not just a beggar with an empty bag, and not simply another agency that needs money," he said. "The money invested in higher education will result in a return, and sufficient dollars should be funded to realize the potential."
Many legislators have viewed higher education as only a benefit to the individual. "But we maintain that it's also a benefit to the state to have an educated society which in turn will attract business and jobs to the state and will keep our young people here," he said.
Roehm says he knows that's possible because he's seen it done. During his years in the Air Force as commander of all air defense forces in the Southeastern United States, he watched the Gulf states use matching funds to obtain funds from the federal government. "They put an emphasis on higher education," he said. "Their level of income used to be right at the bottom, now they're mid-level."
Along with that, Roehm is emphasizing accountability by the university system. "We have a very open form of accounting where the dollars come from and where they go," he said. "The days of 20-page budgets are long past."
With over 30,000 students and campuses in Helena, Bozeman, Billings, Great Falls, Dillon, Havre, Butte and Missoula, the board has crafted a mission: "To serve students through the delivery of high quality, accessible postsecondary educational opportunities, while actively participating in the preservation and advancement of Montana's economy and society."
Part of that access to education, according to Roehm, is the number of campuses in Montana.
"Campuses across the state are especially necessary for those that come to school looking for retraining," he said. "Plus, campuses can get so big that they're impersonal. We're determined to maintain what we've got. We tailor what we offer to meet the needs of the people of the state."
Roehm, retired from a 25-year career in the Air Force, has served on the board since his appointment in 1998. He agreed to become a member of the board only after he was satisfied that board members were not just figureheads. He also had a personal interest...he wanted to insure the transferability of credits within the university system. His nephew had spent two years at the Havre campus, and when he came to Bozeman, none of his credits would transfer.
The board is a policy board that meets six-times a year. They establish policy based on recommendations from the public, campus administrators and students. The day-to-day administration of the campuses is delegated to the Commissioner of Higher Education and the campus presidents. In 1994 the board was again reorganized, this time to consolidate the oversight function of the campuses to the presidents of Montana State University-Bozeman and the University of Montana. The consolidation made the system more efficient and kept each individual campus from lobbying the commissioner and the legislature.
"Each year we set a mission, vision and goals," Roehm said. "We evaluate our administrators on how they perform the mission of the board."
"There's a steep learning curve as a board member," he said. "There are so many different ways money comes into the system, and there is a need to understand what educational function each campus fulfills. It takes time to absorb it all. It's like you're drinking from a fire hydrant for a while."
Roehm says as a board member he's most proud of the personnel they've hired to run the campuses. "Geoff Gamble at Bozeman personifies the thinking of a positive 'can do' approach and attitude."
"We set that tone as a board," he said. "No more whining and doom and gloom. We understand the fiscal realities of the state and we'll do our part. We're partners."